Skip to content

chore: update Nuxt to 4.6 and compatible Vue tooling - #171

Merged
comfuture merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/nuxt-4.6-compatible-updates
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

comfuture merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/nuxt-4.6-compatible-updates

Conversation

@comfuture

@comfuture comfuture commented Oct 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Validation

  • GitHub CI / validate passed on exact head d8d352e18516f5bab7eee86e8466cb52329e5c3c: frozen-lockfile install, Nuxt prepare, lint, typecheck, all 1,071 tests (616 client, 264 server, 191 WebXR), and complete production build.
  • Local installation, Nuxt prepare, 12 focused settings/navigation/composer-control tests, and git diff --check pass on Node 24.19.0 / pnpm 11.20.0.
  • Sequential local Nuxt production build passes: 10 prerendered routes and generated PWA assets. HTTP/static-artifact smoke verified the landing, settings, general, notifications, voice, backend, and chats shells plus their emitted assets; service-worker fallback and API/XR exclusions remain present. The manifest remains server-generated by the existing route.

Verification limits

The cloud sandbox blocks Unix-domain sockets, reproducing baseline server-test failures; the same full server suite passes in CI. Initial concurrent local lint/build attempts were terminated by shared-memory pressure (exit 137); sequential local build and exact-head CI succeed. Interactive desktop/mobile browser smoke could not run: cloud Chromium launch requires denied Unix sockets, and the supported cloud browser rejects the localhost preview. No interactive browser or physical-headset pass is claimed. No merge or deployment performed.

@comfuture
comfuture marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2026 01:07
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-07T01:22:42.214258Z 39eaaca Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d8d352e185

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread packages/server/package.json Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review
Review head: 39eaaca04cae9cbe67d411865f28a7968fe9e502

Verify the narrow service-bundle Node-engine compatibility fix: strict semver validation, boundary/invalid/prerelease cases, and the equivalent >=-first manifest expression allowing supported-node upgrades through the existing minimum-only updater. Check that the declared support set is unchanged and service setup/self-update regression coverage matches the actual preparation path. Keep this review within the Node-engine regression introduced by this dependency update.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: 39eaaca04c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@comfuture
comfuture merged commit e99c77b into main Oct 7, 2026
2 checks passed
@comfuture
comfuture deleted the chore/nuxt-4.6-compatible-updates branch October 7, 2026 01:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant