Skip to content

RFC for static generic parameters #273

Closed

Description

@rust-highfive

This is a rough draft to see whether something like this should be done. I'd appreciate feedback on how the technical details could look like, since I do not know a lot about the compiler internals myself.

Tracking issue for postponed PR #56

Activity

  1. added
    postponedRFCs that have been postponed and may be revisited at a later time.
    on Sep 24, 2014
  2. Gankra commented on Oct 8, 2014

    @Gankra
    Contributor

    CC me

  3. milibopp commented on Dec 13, 2014

    @milibopp

    I rebased my working branch for #56 onto the current master. We could use this as a starting point for discussion.

  4. milibopp commented on Dec 14, 2014

    @milibopp

    I've updated and extended the RFC on my branch a bit. Feedback welcome!

  5. globin commented on Jan 2, 2015

    @globin

    CC me

  6. milibopp commented on Feb 5, 2015

    @milibopp

    I posted my current draft on discourse to get some feedback.

  7. added
    T-langRelevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the RFC.
    on Aug 17, 2016
  8. scottmcm commented on Jan 19, 2018

    @scottmcm
    Member

    With #2000 merged; I think this can now be closed.

  9. removed
    postponedRFCs that have been postponed and may be revisited at a later time.
    on Feb 24, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    T-langRelevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the RFC.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions