Skip to content

VRF association in NetClassIface #405

Open

Description

@bluecmd

Hi,

One metric dimension that I am missing from Node Exporter is the VRF association for interfaces.

It looks like the current implementation relies on reading /sys/class/net. For VRFs this is visible as a generic upper (or master) / lower hierarchy.

Example:

bluecmd@adele:/sys/class/net/Ethernet92$ ls -lah
total 0
drwxr-xr-x   5 root root    0 Aug  2 15:06 .
drwxr-xr-x 122 root root    0 Aug  2 15:06 ..
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4.0K Aug  2 15:06 addr_assign_type
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4.0K Aug  2 15:06 address
[..]
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4.0K Aug  2 15:06 iflink
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4.0K Aug  2 15:06 link_mode
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root    0 Aug  2 15:06 master -> ../VrfKamel
-rw-r--r--   1 root root 4.0K Aug  2 15:06 mtu
[..]
-rw-r--r--   1 root root 4.0K Aug  2 15:06 uevent
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root    0 Aug  2 15:06 upper_VrfKamel -> ../VrfKamel

However, sadly, the VrfKamel master directory does not contain anything saying that it is a VRF interface. The type file would be my first guess but that appears to be more "What kind of protocol does this interface handle?" which is both 1 for EthernetX and VrfX.

The better way appears to use netlink to find the VRFs:

bluecmd@adele:/sys/class/net/eth0$ ip link show type vrf
9: mgmt: <NOARP,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether d6:1e:f6:a2:87:b9 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
12: VrfKamel: <NOARP,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 66:d8:f1:b8:0f:96 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
14: VrfMainframe: <NOARP,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 8e:37:34:f5:bd:e3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

Happy to take any questions or suggestions! Might even end up making a PR for it if the stars align and we can figure out a design :-).

Activity

  1. discordianfish commented on Aug 3, 2021

    @discordianfish
    Member

    Yeah using netlink would be the way to go. Seems reasonable to add!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions