Repository navigation
io.js TC Meeting 2015-04-29 #1557
Description
UTC Wed 29-Apr-15 20:00:
- San Francisco: Wed 22-Mar-15 13:00
- Amsterdam: Wed 22-Mar-15 22:00
- Moscow: Wed 22-Mar-15 23:00
- Sydney: Thu 23-Mar-15 06:00
Or in your local time:
- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=io.js+TC+Meeting+2015-04-29&iso=20150429T20
- or http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=8pm+UTC%2C+April+29%2C+2015+in+local+time
Please allow time for cat-herding before broadcast starts.
Public YouTube feed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-e675TT4WEA
Google Plus Event page: https://plus.google.com/events/cei87pqnichrtt4qggbbo656bpk
Google Doc for minutes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C9nfm_5EhNz1jifITbtQcnGBX4R9vktoZ9KsFiCU7sQ (written in markdown so we can put it straight into the repo)
Invited: @bnoordhuis (TC), @piscisaureus (TC), @indutny (TC), @isaacs (TC), @trevnorris (TC), @chrisdickinson (TC, streams), @mikeal (website), @rvagg (TC), @domenic (observer), @Fishrock123 (TC), @shigeki (observer), @mscdex (observer)
Agenda so far: lifted from issues marked with _tc-agenda_, please label, or ask to have issues labelled if they need to be elevated to TC discussion.
Note: There will be time at the end of the meeting for interactive QA with people in the #io.js channel on Freenode.
Activity
rvagg commentedon Apr 29, 2015
sorry for the late notification @shigeki
shigeki commentedon Apr 29, 2015
@rvagg Never mind. I found this in the last minutes.
silverwind commentedon Apr 29, 2015
Added #1539 to the agenda (JS code style with two empty lines).Fishrock123 commentedon Apr 29, 2015
Adding #1559 unless it is otherwise cleared up beforehand
domenic commentedon Apr 29, 2015
Do we really need to elevate decisions of style to the TC?
silverwind commentedon Apr 29, 2015
I suppose it's not strictly necessary. The other option would be to leave the PR pending for a week or so and merge if no one objects directly.
Fishrock123 commentedon Apr 29, 2015
Not sure #1539 is worth discussing (yet?). I suppose we could talk about how much we'd be willing to re-style if we switched linters.. but I think the consensus will end up being "bare minimum" at most.
silverwind commentedon Apr 29, 2015
@Fishrock123 Agreed, let's give it a bit more time. There's a few more rules that will controversial because you can never satisfy everyone on style.
trevnorris commentedon Apr 29, 2015
@silverwind just to double check, will the style match to best possible what's already there or is it making drastic changes?
silverwind commentedon Apr 29, 2015
@trevnorris no real drastic changes except the double newline thing, which I think wasn't enforced by the old linter either.
Most of the changes are
varredefinitions in the same scope and a few other inconistencies the old linter didn't catch. We'll try to keep the changes to a minimum.Rossolson commentedon Apr 30, 2015
Seems like the timezone dates didn't get changed:
22-Mar-1513:0022-Mar-1522:0022-Mar-1523:0023-Mar-1506:00rvagg commentedon May 13, 2015
sorry for the late notification @shigeki