Skip to content

Node.js Foundation Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2019-01-23 #655

Closed

Description

@mhdawson

Time

UTC Wed 23-Jan-2019 16:00 (04:00 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Wed 23-Jan-2019 08:00 (08:00 AM)
US / Mountain Wed 23-Jan-2019 09:00 (09:00 AM)
US / Central Wed 23-Jan-2019 10:00 (10:00 AM)
US / Eastern Wed 23-Jan-2019 11:00 (11:00 AM)
London Wed 23-Jan-2019 16:00 (04:00 PM)
Amsterdam Wed 23-Jan-2019 17:00 (05:00 PM)
Moscow Wed 23-Jan-2019 19:00 (07:00 PM)
Chennai Wed 23-Jan-2019 21:30 (09:30 PM)
Hangzhou Thu 24-Jan-2019 00:00 (12:00 AM)
Tokyo Thu 24-Jan-2019 01:00 (01:00 AM)
Sydney Thu 24-Jan-2019 03:00 (03:00 AM)

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from tsc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/node

  • repl: emit uncaughtException #20803

nodejs/TSC

  • NODE_MODULE_VERSION for Electron Major Releases #651
  • Tracking issue for updating TSC on Board Meetings #476
  • Strategic Initiatives - Tracking Issue #423

Invited

Observers/Guests

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with tsc-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/611357642
Regular password

Public participation

We stream our conference call straight to YouTube so anyone can listen to it live, it should start playing at https://www.youtube.com/c/nodejs+foundation/live when we turn it on. There's usually a short cat-herding time at the start of the meeting and then occasionally we have some quick private business to attend to before we can start recording & streaming. So be patient and it should show up.

Many of us will be on IRC in #node-dev on Freenode if you'd like to interact, we have a Q/A session scheduled at the end of the meeting if you'd like us to discuss anything in particular. @nodejs/collaborators in particular if there's anything you need from the TSC that's not worth putting on as a separate agenda item, this is a good place for that.


Invitees

Please use the following emoji reactions in this post to indicate your
availability.

  • 👍 - Attending
  • 👎 - Not attending
  • 😕 - Not sure yet

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Jan 21, 2019
  2. mcollina commented on Jan 21, 2019

    @mcollina
    SponsorMember

    I can chair this if it's needed.

  3. Trott commented on Jan 21, 2019

    @Trott
    Member

    No agenda items, so seems like a high likelihood of cancelling.

    Two things it is worth looking over and preparing for in general are nodejs/node#22584 and nodejs/node#21351. One or both will almost certainly will come before TSC before the April release. They are controversial things with long histories. It would be great if, when the inevitable discussion occurs, everyone who is participating sounds prepared.

    I will likely miss the first 15+ minutes, but can attend otherwise.

  4. mcollina commented on Jan 21, 2019

    @mcollina
    SponsorMember

    There is a security issue we should talk about.

  5. mhdawson commented on Jan 21, 2019

    @mhdawson
    MemberAuthor

    I'll be there and can Chair. There is other business as well that we should discuss so would like to hold the meeting.

  6. mhdawson commented on Jan 21, 2019

    @mhdawson
    MemberAuthor

    There should be issues on the agenda, for some reason the tool failed to generate them properly. Investigating.

  7. mhdawson commented on Jan 21, 2019

    @mhdawson
    MemberAuthor

    Ok have added the missing issues.

  8. Trott commented on Jan 21, 2019

    @Trott
    Member

    For the NODE_MODULE_VERSION ABI issue (#651), perhaps invite @codebytere to attend as a guest? Maybe after confirming that there will be sufficient attendance by invested/informed folks? Maybe folks can self-nominate on that front, but judging from the issues and previous conversations, likely candidates might be @gabrielschulhof @mhdawson @mcollina @MylesBorins @ofrobots @rvagg

  9. mhdawson commented on Jan 21, 2019

    @mhdawson
    MemberAuthor

    @gabrielschulhof @mhdawson @mcollina @MylesBorins @ofrobots @rvagg can you chime in if you can make it. If enough can we can see if @codebytere can make it.

  10. rvagg commented on Jan 22, 2019

    @rvagg
    Member

    Won't be making it, 3am, but for the NODE_MODULE_VERSION discussion, our docs state that if a third party wants to reserve a number they need to open an issue here, as has been done in the recent past for Debian. I don't think there's any blockers to just saying sure, take what you need! Not sure we even need to do it in a meeting really, opening an issue ought to be enough for an embedder or extender.

    But we need to keep track of these reservations; hence my proposal for a registry @ nodejs/node#24114 - one central place to keep a record, machine readable and easy to PR a request to reserve for Electron and others that need a number. Incrementing is cheap, there shouldn't be a reason to block anyone requesting as long as we can do it in a coordinated fashion. I haven't forgotten about that PR, it's just been a low priority and there was a good suggestion for more metadata that I was considering changing the format to incorporate.

  11. apapirovski commented on Jan 23, 2019

    @apapirovski
    Contributor

    I don't think nodejs/node#20803 should be on the agenda. It looks like the request was for TSC to review the PR since it's semver-major. I do not think there is anything to discuss at the meeting...

  12. BridgeAR commented on Jan 23, 2019

    @BridgeAR
    Member

    @apapirovski I agree that it's not really sonething to discuss. I only added it because no one pointed it in any direction and that seems pretty bad. It would be good to get any response. Yes, there were a few comments but no one either gave a LG or said anything against landing it.

    For that reason I kindly ask the TSC members to review more semver-major PRs as it's otherwise difficult to deal with these.

  13. ofrobots commented on Jan 23, 2019

    @ofrobots
    Contributor
  14. thefourtheye commented on Jan 25, 2019

    @thefourtheye
    Contributor

    Sorry for the delay. No significant moderation team activities this week.


    cc @nodejs/tsc @nodejs/community-committee @nodejs/moderation

  15. Trott commented on Jan 25, 2019

    @Trott
    Member

    Minutes PR is #658 so I think this can be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions