Bringing back regular meetings

I think that moving to no longer having meetings was a good idea at the time, but a few things have shifted since then and it feels like there is a need for some sort of regular cadence sync.

Would people be open to spinning up a monthly meeting for the WG?

+1

Bump @nodejs/release

ping @nodejs/release

+1

There's one issue over in nodejs/node tagged with the lts-agenda label (nodejs/node#17155) and probably nodejs/node#20306 would be tagged also if regular meetings were still happening.

@MylesBorins

@MylesBorins should we just schedule a meeting to get started?

Another PR with lts-agenda tag: nodejs/node#22633

@MylesBorins

@MylesBorins are you still in favor or restarting regular meetings? @BethGriggs if @MylesBorins answers yes would you be able to volunteer to help choose a time and setup the meeting (I can help with adding to Node.js calendar etc.)

I am very +1 on starting this up again

…

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018, 3:28 PM Michael Dawson ***@***.***> wrote: @MylesBorins <https://github.com/MylesBorins> are you still in favor or restarting regular meetings? @BethGriggs <https://github.com/BethGriggs> if @MylesBorins <https://github.com/MylesBorins> answers yes would you be able to volunteer to help choose a time and setup the meeting (I can help with adding to Node.js calendar etc.) — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#333 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecVyR7qN6N_HfHa9PJSJNb12X9lrblks5ueTJlgaJpZM4Ts91x> .

I am +1 as well

Initially thinking of meeting every two weeks? I set up a doodle to start to try and find a regular day/time for us to meet - https://doodle.com/poll/95b6f5zdgxzy75n9

@nodejs/release

@nodejs/release looks like we could use more people to fill in the doodle.

Ping @nodejs/release

Don't let my awkward timezone be a blocker for finding a good slot. I think the majority of folks here are close to UTC or in US East and you have lots of potential slots.

I am also +1 for meetings.

The doodle is outdated, so I did not fill it out. I believe it's best to open up a new and smaller one which contains exactly one week which we use as reference for all weeks?

I have alternating bi weekly meetings. So imho it does make sense to have two weeks on the doodle.

…

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 9:03 AM Ruben Bridgewater ***@***.*** wrote: I am also +1 for meetings. The doodle is outdated, so I did not fill it out. I believe it's best to open up a new and smaller one which contains exactly one week which we use as reference for all weeks? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#333 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecV4rfVOluD2m9DpZVGwKmomwJaBIlks5u37tIgaJpZM4Ts91x> .

Alternatively, does anyone object to 11 ET on Thursdays? (Figured if we can all agree on that time perhaps we don't need to do a doodle)

…

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 9:09 AM Myles Borins ***@***.*** wrote: I have alternating bi weekly meetings. So imho it does make sense to have two weeks on the doodle. On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 9:03 AM Ruben Bridgewater ***@***.*** wrote: > I am also +1 for meetings. > > The doodle is outdated, so I did not fill it out. I believe it's best to > open up a new and smaller one which contains exactly one week which we use > as reference for all weeks? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#333 (comment)>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecV4rfVOluD2m9DpZVGwKmomwJaBIlks5u37tIgaJpZM4Ts91x> > . >

11 ET is OK for me, if we start in January

3am for me, I'm not quite that excited, so it's a no for me

@rvagg

11 ET on Thursdays would be fine for me. But since that does not work for @rvagg maybe we could move it either three hours earlier or three hours later (while I could not participate well three hours later).

don't bother, ET + Europe makes it tough to include APAC

Based on the above I'd like to propose we have a first meeting on the 17th and meet biweekly afterwards

I've added it to the Calendar and the Zoom

They are back!

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Bringing back regular meetings #333

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Bringing back regular meetings #333

Description

Activity

mhdawson commented on Apr 30, 2018

mhdawson commented on May 14, 2018

MylesBorins commented on May 21, 2018

richardlau commented on May 30, 2018

mhdawson commented on Jul 9, 2018

richardlau commented on Aug 31, 2018

mhdawson commented on Sep 24, 2018

MylesBorins commented on Sep 24, 2018

targos commented on Sep 24, 2018

BethGriggs commented on Oct 18, 2018

mhdawson commented on Nov 12, 2018

targos commented on Dec 8, 2018

rvagg commented on Dec 11, 2018

BridgeAR commented on Dec 11, 2018

MylesBorins commented on Dec 11, 2018

MylesBorins commented on Dec 11, 2018

targos commented on Dec 11, 2018

rvagg commented on Dec 18, 2018

BridgeAR commented on Dec 18, 2018

rvagg commented on Dec 19, 2018

MylesBorins commented on Jan 3, 2019

MylesBorins commented on Jan 8, 2019

MylesBorins commented on Mar 19, 2019

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions