SRE-1129: Stop turbo from inserting agent guidance into the root AGENTS.md

[lunelson]

🌟 Purpose

Turbo 2.11.5 and later write an agent-guidance block into the root AGENTS.md whenever they run. We maintain that file by hand, so every turbo run leaves an unwanted diff.

This PR sets "agentGuidance": false in the root turbo.json, which turns the behaviour off. Turbo documents the key in its configuration schema.

🔍 Changes

• The key is unknown to turbo 2.11.2, the version pinned in .config/mise/config.toml, and turbo then fails to parse turbo.json. The PR therefore also bumps the pin and mise.lock to 2.11.5, the first version that knows the key. It is past the repo's 7-day minimum_release_age.
• To verify, run turbo run manifest --dry=json --filter=hash-repo-chores with turbo 2.11.5 (mise install) and check git status. AGENTS.md stays unchanged. Without the key, the same command adds 11 lines to it.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hash	Ready	Preview	Oct 6, 2026 8:13am UTC
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Oct 6, 2026 8:13am UTC
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Oct 6, 2026 8:13am UTC
petrinaut-docs	Ready	Preview	Oct 6, 2026 8:13am UTC

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.50%. Comparing base (25dd9ca) to head (036ba32).
⚠️ Report is 42 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main    #9930    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   66.50%   66.50%            
========================================
  Files        1954     1956     +2     
  Lines      215334   215945   +611     
  Branches     8420     8438    +18     
========================================
+ Hits       143200   143611   +411     
- Misses      70535    70729   +194     
- Partials     1599     1605     +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	2.04% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	15.35% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	41.37% <ø> (+3.22%)	⬆️
durable-kernel	86.65% <ø> (ø)
error-stack	90.55% <ø> (ø)
harpc-codec	84.61% <ø> (ø)
harpc-net	96.28% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
harpc-tower	67.11% <ø> (ø)
harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
harpc-wire-protocol	93.85% <ø> (ø)
hash-codec	72.09% <ø> (ø)
hash-config	83.57% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph	14.11% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-api	36.80% <ø> (+0.59%)	⬆️
hash-graph-atlas	80.00% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-authentication	97.63% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-authorization	68.47% <ø> (+0.79%)	⬆️
hash-graph-embeddings	91.54% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-postgres-store	31.96% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
hash-graph-store	51.60% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-temporal-versioning	50.53% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-validation	85.37% <ø> (ø)
hash-middleware	89.60% <ø> (ø)
hashql-ast	90.01% <ø> (ø)
hashql-compiletest	28.71% <ø> (ø)
hashql-core	81.41% <ø> (ø)
hashql-diagnostics	72.85% <ø> (ø)
hashql-eval	79.77% <ø> (ø)
hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
hashql-mir	87.22% <ø> (ø)
hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.77% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.27% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	12.22% <ø> (ø)
problematic	90.09% <ø> (ø)
railroad-plugin	45.28% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ 6 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚠️	as_constant	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	constant_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	constant_not_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	access	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	runtime_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	runtime_not_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A

---

_{Comparing ln/sre-1129-disable-turbo-agent-guidance (036ba32) with main (27bc07e)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (accbc91) during the generation of this report, so 27bc07e was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.446 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 564 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.866 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$24.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.915 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.880 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.014 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.891 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.645 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.823 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.803 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.875 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.620 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.021 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$32.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$71.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 514 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}36.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$36.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$40.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$42.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 230 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$428 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.36 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}76.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$92.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 882 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.961 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$80.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 529 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$280 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.45 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.491 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.969 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.606 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.562 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.675 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.675 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$56.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 807 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$62.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 575 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.691 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$72.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 646 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$80.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 614 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$87.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 865 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$46.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 409 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$75.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 617 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.537 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 718 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.307 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 629 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 733 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 794 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.02 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$23.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.200 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$504 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.75 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.762 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Tooling-only change: one turbo.json flag and a patch-level turbo pin bump; no runtime app or auth/data paths affected.

Overview
Disables Turbo’s automatic agent-guidance writes to the hand-maintained root AGENTS.md by setting "agentGuidance": false in turbo.json, so routine turbo runs no longer leave unwanted diffs on that file.

Because Turbo 2.11.2 (previously pinned via mise) rejects the unknown config key, the PR also bumps npm:turbo to 2.11.5 in .config/mise/config.toml and the matching entry in mise.lock—the first release that supports the option and past the repo’s 7-day minimum release age.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 036ba32. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[TimDiekmann]

According to the docs this is a unique block. Is this something which might be useful actually? How does it look like?