Skip to content

Add monorepo-affected-ci skill 🤖🤖🤖 - #4561

Open
MarkAlex1234 wants to merge 1 commit into
github:mainfrom
MarkAlex1234:add-monorepo-affected-ci-skill
Open

MarkAlex1234 wants to merge 1 commit into
github:mainfrom
MarkAlex1234:add-monorepo-affected-ci-skill

Conversation

@MarkAlex1234

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds monorepo-affected-ci, a skill for making GitHub Actions in a monorepo run only the affected projects, including dependents of shared libraries, without the silent gaps hand-written path filters create.

Why it adds uplift over the model's defaults. These failure modes are common and easy to get wrong:

  • on.paths filters that miss a shared library's dependents.
  • Bare directories in paths that match nothing.
  • Required checks that block merges forever when a path filter skips their workflow; the skill gives the always-run gate-job fix.
  • An empty fromJSON matrix, which fails the job.
  • The diff base for push on a new branch and for merge_group.

It includes a plan → matrix → gate workflow and a manifest-based algorithm for computing affected projects. It mentions dynamic-monorepo once, as an optional zero-config implementation, alongside Nx and Turborepo.

npm run skill:validate passes, and npm start regenerated docs/README.skills.md.

Disclosure: I maintain dynamic-monorepo. An AI agent prepared this PR.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚦 Submission status: 👀 Ready for review

Risk tier: merge-risk:high — Privileged execution, automation, or review-policy change
Required to merge: passing submission-gate checks plus 2 approvals from reviewers with write access, including a maintainer with admin or maintain permission.

Why this tier
  • Label needs-review:HIGH flags a high contributor-risk signal

Automated checks

Check Status Details
Line endings ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Spelling ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Generated README consistency ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Skill validation ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Skill lint (vally) ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Risk scan ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Contributor reputation ✅ Passed Passed · logs
Duplicate resource scan ✅ Passed Passed · logs
PR quality signal ⏭️ Skipped Skipped by its workflow · logs

Review

  • Approvals: 0/2
  • Assigned reviewer: not assigned yet — comment /request-review to ask for one
  • Review target date: not set
  • Still needed: 2 more approval(s); an approval from a maintainer with admin or maintain permission
  • The core-maintainers pool is not staffed yet; an approver with admin or maintain permission is required instead.

Commands

Command Who What it does
/rerun-checks PR author, maintainers Re-runs failed or incomplete checks and re-evaluates this gate
/request-review PR author, maintainers Asks the review rotation to assign a reviewer (adds needs-reviewer)

Updated for 8e5e113 · gate run · This comment is maintained automatically — see submission gate docs.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added new-submission PR adds at least one new contribution skills PR touches skills labels Oct 6, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 PR Risk Scan Results

Scanned 1 changed file(s).

Severity Count
🔴 High 0
🟠 Medium 1
ℹ️ Info 0
Severity Rule File Line Match
🟠 package-exec-command skills/monorepo-affected-ci/SKILL.md 75 npx github:Continuous-Actions/dynamic-monorepo audit

This is an automated soft-gate report. Findings indicate review targets and do not block merge by themselves.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔴 Contributor Reputation Check: HIGH risk

Check Risk
Profile HIGH
Credential audit NONE

Maintainers: please review this contributor before merging.
See the workflow run for full details.
Automated check powered by AGT.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the needs-review:HIGH Contributor reputation check flagged HIGH risk label Oct 6, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Vally Lint Results

✅ All checks passed

Scope Checked
Skills 1
Agents 0
Total 1
Severity Count
❌ Errors 0
⚠️ Warnings 0
ℹ️ Advisories 0

Summary

Level Finding
ℹ️ ✅ monorepo-affected-ci (2/2 checks passed)
ℹ️ ✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
ℹ️ ✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
ℹ️ ✓ [valid-refs] All file references across 1 skill(s) are valid.
ℹ️ ✓ valid-refs: All file references resolve to existing files within the skill directory.
ℹ️ 1 skill(s) linted, 1 passed
Full linter output
### Linting skills/monorepo-affected-ci
✅ monorepo-affected-ci (2/2 checks passed)
    ✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
        ✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
    ✓ [valid-refs] All file references across 1 skill(s) are valid.
        ✓ valid-refs: All file references resolve to existing files within the skill directory.

1 skill(s) linted, 1 passed

@github-actions github-actions Bot added ready-for-review Submission passed intake validation and is ready for maintainer review and removed awaiting-automation labels Oct 6, 2026

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merge-risk:high needs-review:HIGH Contributor reputation check flagged HIGH risk new-submission PR adds at least one new contribution ready-for-review Submission passed intake validation and is ready for maintainer review skills PR touches skills

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant