Add etsy-market-research-apify skill (Etsy research via Apify Actors) 🤖🤖🤖

[GeminiGeorge22]

Summary

Adds one skill: skills/etsy-market-research-apify/SKILL.md — practical Copilot guidance for Etsy market research using two Apify Actors:

• publicrecords/etsy-search-scraper — live search / market / category listing rows
• publicrecords/etsy-shop-velocity — shop sales counters, deltas, breakout flags

Covers setup (token + MCP pin), inputs, output field tables, cost-per-run estimates (FREE-tier PPE read 2026-10-02), and limitations. Tone is technical/neutral; links are limited to Actor pages and Apify docs/CLI.

Also updates docs/README.skills.md via npm start.

Disclosure

Disclosure: I maintain these Actors on Apify Store (publicrecords).

Aligned with Discussion #968 (paid/vendor-backed content): affiliation clear, no pitch language, practical Copilot usage focus.

Validation

• npm run skill:validate → All 427 skills are valid
• npm start → README skills table regenerated

Notes for reviewers

Happy to revise if anything reads promotional or if field/cost wording should be tightened further.

[github-actions]

🚦 Submission status: ⏳ Awaiting automation

Risk tier: merge-risk:medium — New or substantially changed resource without privileged execution
Required to merge: passing submission-gate checks plus 1 approval from reviewers with write access.

Why this tier

• Adds 1 file(s), e.g. skills/etsy-market-research-apify/SKILL.md
• Changes 190 lines (low-risk limit is 40)

Automated checks

Check	Status	Details
Line endings	✅ Passed	Passed · logs
Spelling	✅ Passed	Passed · logs
Generated README consistency	✅ Passed	Passed · logs
Skill validation	✅ Passed	Passed · logs
Skill lint (vally)	✅ Passed	Passed · logs
Risk scan	✅ Passed	Passed · logs
Contributor reputation	✅ Passed	Passed · logs
Duplicate resource scan	✅ Passed	Passed · logs
PR quality signal	⏭️ Skipped	Skipped by its workflow · logs
Contributor risk signal	🔧 Infrastructure failure	The contributor check succeeded but its result artifact was missing, unreadable, or for another commit · logs

Action needed

• 🔧 Contributor risk signal hit an automation problem that is not caused by your contribution. Comment /rerun-checks to retry; maintainers are notified if it keeps failing.

Review

• Approvals: 0/1
• Assigned reviewer: not assigned yet — comment /request-review to ask for one
• Review target date: not set
• Still needed: 1 more approval(s)
• No staffed reviewer pool owns these files yet; any reviewer with write access counts as the domain reviewer.

Commands

Command	Who	What it does
/rerun-checks	PR author, maintainers	Re-runs failed or incomplete checks and re-evaluates this gate
/request-review	PR author, maintainers	Asks the review rotation to assign a reviewer (adds needs-reviewer)

_{Updated for e5ac7fd · gate run · This comment is maintained automatically — see submission gate docs.}

[github-actions]

🔒 PR Risk Scan Results

Scanned 1 changed file(s).

Severity	Count
🔴 High	0
🟠 Medium	0
ℹ️ Info	0

✅ No matching risk patterns were detected in changed files.

This is an automated soft-gate report. Findings indicate review targets and do not block merge by themselves.

[github-actions]

🟡 Contributor Reputation Check: MEDIUM risk

Check	Risk
Profile	MEDIUM
Credential audit	NONE

Maintainers: please review this contributor before merging.
See the workflow run for full details.
Automated check powered by AGT.

[github-actions]

🔍 Vally Lint Results

✅ All checks passed

Scope	Checked
Skills	1
Agents	0
Total	1

Severity	Count
❌ Errors	0
⚠️ Warnings	0
ℹ️ Advisories	0

Summary

Level	Finding
ℹ️	✅ etsy-market-research-apify (2/2 checks passed)
ℹ️	✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
ℹ️	✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
ℹ️	✓ [valid-refs] All file references across 1 skill(s) are valid.
ℹ️	✓ valid-refs: All file references resolve to existing files within the skill directory.
ℹ️	1 skill(s) linted, 1 passed

Full linter output

### Linting skills/etsy-market-research-apify
✅ etsy-market-research-apify (2/2 checks passed)
    ✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
        ✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
    ✓ [valid-refs] All file references across 1 skill(s) are valid.
        ✓ valid-refs: All file references resolve to existing files within the skill directory.

1 skill(s) linted, 1 passed

[GeminiGeorge22]

/request-review

[github-actions]

🙋 Added needs-reviewer. Reviewer routing is assigning a reviewer now.