You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Question] Sub-exports depending on main export bundle the entire main-export. #1027
I have a project where I have a main-export and multiple other exports. The other exports are extensions that depend on the main-export, but I don't want them to be in the main-export to keep it as small as possible.
(rpt2 plugin) Error: [...]: semantic error TS2307: Cannot find module '[...]' or its corresponding type declarations.
So I tried to tell typescript about the package:
// in tsconfig.json / compilerOptions
"paths": { "@me/my-package": ["./src/main.ts"] },
That compiles without error, but unfortunately didn't change anything in the output (still contains everything from the main.ts in a.ts' output).
The next thing I tried was to instead specify the path as .:
// in tsconfig.json / compilerOptions
"paths": { "@me/my-package": ["."] },
but that leads to the following error:
rpt2: options error TS5055: Cannot write file '[...]/dist/x.d.ts' because it would overwrite input file.
I finally solved it, by explicitly telling microbundle to treat the module as external (and using the first solution from above to make typescript happy):
I ran into a similar issue - @usefulthink your solution worked, but it means the UMD build now contains a require call rather than being all bundled together. I think this is probably something where microbundle needs to be smart about setting external differently for different outputs.
Activity
developit commentedon Feb 18, 2023
You need to import the package name in your source, not the entry filename:
usefulthink commentedon Feb 20, 2023
Thanks a lot for the quick response!
I tried that, and first got the following error:
So I tried to tell typescript about the package:
That compiles without error, but unfortunately didn't change anything in the output (still contains everything from the main.ts in a.ts' output).
The next thing I tried was to instead specify the path as
.:but that leads to the following error:
I finally solved it, by explicitly telling microbundle to treat the module as external (and using the first solution from above to make typescript happy):
Is that something that microbundle should have been able to pick up on automatically?
bhollis commentedon Aug 15, 2023
I ran into a similar issue - @usefulthink your solution worked, but it means the UMD build now contains a
requirecall rather than being all bundled together. I think this is probably something where microbundle needs to be smart about settingexternaldifferently for different outputs.