You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Questions about deformable asset conversion and trajectory collection #2
Our current controller is based on inverse dynamics and does not yet include motion planning or obstacle avoidance, so it can be a bit difficult to use in practice.
We are planning to integrate a motion planner such as cuRobo, as well as a teleoperation interface for the robotic arm, before open-sourcing it.
Thanks again! I have one more question about the soft assets. Were the assets downloaded directly from EXTWIN already provided as PhysX FEM deformable objects and ready to use without any additional processing?
Activity
Bowen12137 commentedon Aug 7, 2026
fanzhenxuan commentedon Aug 9, 2026
Thanks for the clarification! Do you plan to release the scripted expert code used to generate the demonstrations?
Bowen12137 commentedon Aug 9, 2026
Thanks for asking!
Our current controller is based on inverse dynamics and does not yet include motion planning or obstacle avoidance, so it can be a bit difficult to use in practice.
We are planning to integrate a motion planner such as cuRobo, as well as a teleoperation interface for the robotic arm, before open-sourcing it.
fanzhenxuan commentedon Aug 9, 2026
Thanks again! I have one more question about the soft assets. Were the assets downloaded directly from EXTWIN already provided as PhysX FEM deformable objects and ready to use without any additional processing?