Repository navigation
refactor: use bytes.ReplaceAll directly - #3455
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3455 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.63% 98.63%
=======================================
Files 42 42
Lines 3140 3140
=======================================
Hits 3097 3097
Misses 29 29
Partials 14 14
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
Member
|
build fail |
lgbgbl
force-pushed
the
refactor/bytes-replace
branch
from
January 20, 2023 16:04
746ac8b to
25fc611
Compare
thinkerou
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2023
12 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use
bytes.ReplaceAll(name, centerDot, dot)instead ofbytes.Replace(name, centerDot, dot, -1), which looks more concise